<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.2" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Using Private Label Rights The RIGHT Way!</title>
	<link>http://www.twentyten.com/using-private-label-rights-the-right-way/</link>
	<description>By Joel Osborne of TwentyTen.com</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 03:17:49 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: stan</title>
		<link>http://www.twentyten.com/using-private-label-rights-the-right-way/#comment-28467</link>
		<dc:creator>stan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jul 2008 17:57:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.twentyten.com/using-private-label-rights-the-right-way/#comment-28467</guid>
		<description>Doug,
I looked at your rewriter. It is similar to wordflood. Only difference, they have all synonyms on top you included them next to each word.

http://www.wordflood.com/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Doug,<br />
I looked at your rewriter. It is similar to wordflood. Only difference, they have all synonyms on top you included them next to each word.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.wordflood.com/">http://www.wordflood.com/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Terry</title>
		<link>http://www.twentyten.com/using-private-label-rights-the-right-way/#comment-28450</link>
		<dc:creator>Terry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jul 2008 07:33:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.twentyten.com/using-private-label-rights-the-right-way/#comment-28450</guid>
		<description>Hi Joel,
Great little video -- this seems to be one of the most often misunderstood areas of PLR products. As you mention, most people buy them then just use them as-is, instead of editing them and making them into their own product. So they are missing out on a lot of potential profits by not turning them into a product that they can call their own, whether it be an ebook, a series of articles or content on their website or blog.

Incidentally, I am a big fan of Doug and Teri's products too, and can heartily recommend them to your readers!

Bye for now,
Terry</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Joel,<br />
Great little video &#8212; this seems to be one of the most often misunderstood areas of PLR products. As you mention, most people buy them then just use them as-is, instead of editing them and making them into their own product. So they are missing out on a lot of potential profits by not turning them into a product that they can call their own, whether it be an ebook, a series of articles or content on their website or blog.</p>
<p>Incidentally, I am a big fan of Doug and Teri&#8217;s products too, and can heartily recommend them to your readers!</p>
<p>Bye for now,<br />
Terry</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doug Anderson</title>
		<link>http://www.twentyten.com/using-private-label-rights-the-right-way/#comment-28438</link>
		<dc:creator>Doug Anderson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jul 2008 19:33:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.twentyten.com/using-private-label-rights-the-right-way/#comment-28438</guid>
		<description>I have read in several places that it is not really necessary to alter the bulk of the document to make it "unique content". It seems that Google puts more emphasis on the title, the first paragraph, and the last paragraph, than on the stuff in between.

There are several article re-writers or content shufflers on the market that purport to make an article unique. Someone posted an article I wrote and had submitted to Ezine Articles, but he put it through a content shuffler first and removed my hypertext links in the Bio box. The article was then unreadable: it was unique from a computer point of view, but useless from a human point of view.

I have been working on my own article re-writer which uses a different approach. It displays the alternate wording (synonyms) directly on screen in drop-down lists. This lets you see alternate text and choose words that make sense to a human.

There is a screen capture here: http://www.maximize-income.info/ArticleRewriter/index.html

It is not quite finished yet, but anyone interested can e-mail me at the address given on that page.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have read in several places that it is not really necessary to alter the bulk of the document to make it &#8220;unique content&#8221;. It seems that Google puts more emphasis on the title, the first paragraph, and the last paragraph, than on the stuff in between.</p>
<p>There are several article re-writers or content shufflers on the market that purport to make an article unique. Someone posted an article I wrote and had submitted to Ezine Articles, but he put it through a content shuffler first and removed my hypertext links in the Bio box. The article was then unreadable: it was unique from a computer point of view, but useless from a human point of view.</p>
<p>I have been working on my own article re-writer which uses a different approach. It displays the alternate wording (synonyms) directly on screen in drop-down lists. This lets you see alternate text and choose words that make sense to a human.</p>
<p>There is a screen capture here: <a href="http://www.maximize-income.info/ArticleRewriter/index.html">http://www.maximize-income.info/ArticleRewriter/index.html</a></p>
<p>It is not quite finished yet, but anyone interested can e-mail me at the address given on that page.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
